Explore our Function Health vs Levels glucose monitoring comparison. We break down cost, features, and user experience to help you choose wisely.

The fundamental difference between Function Health and Levels boils down to scope. Think of it this way: Function Health gives you a comprehensive, long-term satellite view of your entire health landscape by analyzing over 100 biomarkers. On the other hand, Levels provides a hyper-focused, real-time street view of your metabolic response to food using a continuous glucose monitor (CGM).
Your choice depends on your primary goal. Are you looking for a broad diagnostic overview to prevent potential long-term issues, or do you want immediate feedback to fine-tune your diet for better energy day-by-day?
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Please consult with a healthcare provider before making any lifestyle or medication changes.
We're in a fascinating era where personal wellness is moving away from simply reacting to problems and toward proactively optimizing our bodies. We now have access to incredible tools that offer deep insights, shifting the power from once-a-year checkups to data-informed daily decisions. Two major names in this space are Function Health and Levels, and while both use advanced monitoring, they serve very different purposes.
This guide will break them down side-by-side to help you figure out which one truly fits your health goals.
The key piece of hardware in this comparison is the continuous glucose monitor (CGM). A CGM is a small sensor that sticks to your arm and tracks your glucose levels 24/7. This technology has advanced significantly, becoming more accurate, user-friendly, and accessible to the general public.
It works with a tiny, flexible filament that sits just under your skin, measuring the glucose in your interstitial fluid (the fluid surrounding your cells). It then sends these readings to your phone every few minutes. This provides a dynamic, movie-like view of how your body handles food, which is a massive leap from the single-snapshot data of traditional finger-prick tests. For a deeper dive, resources from the International Diabetes Federation offer clear explanations of CGM technology.
The single most important factor in the function health vs levels glucose monitoring decision is your primary goal. Are you trying to understand your long-term risk for chronic diseases? Or is your focus on tweaking your daily nutrition for better energy and metabolic fitness right now?
This simple decision tree can help point you in the right direction.

As you can see, Function Health is built for someone mapping out a holistic, long-term wellness strategy. Levels is designed for those who want immediate, actionable feedback to make lifestyle and dietary adjustments on the fly.
To make this even clearer, let's put their core differences into a simple table.
Here’s a quick summary to highlight the fundamental differences between these two platforms.
Function Health's methodology is all about creating a complete health blueprint over time. It's a wide-angle lens, similar to how other platforms compare broad biomarker panels, which we've covered in our Function Health vs. Mito Health review. Levels, in contrast, uses a zoom lens, zeroing in on one critical piece of your metabolic health to give you immediate, practical feedback.
In short: Function Health provides a broad, annual health overview for long-term planning, while Levels offers real-time, daily feedback to optimize diet and energy.
To really get to the bottom of the Function Health vs. Levels debate, you have to start with their fundamental missions. These aren't just two different apps—they represent two completely different ways of thinking about your health. Choosing the right one boils down to a simple question: Are you looking for a panoramic, long-term view of your body's systems, or do you need a microscopic, real-time analysis of your diet?

Function Health is built on a foundation of comprehensive, preventative medicine. The goal here is to give you a deep and wide diagnostic baseline so you and your doctor can make smarter, more strategic health decisions for the long haul. It’s about moving beyond single data points to build a complete picture of your health from the inside out.
Think of Function Health's approach like getting an incredibly in-depth annual physical, but supercharged with data. The platform analyzes over 100 biomarkers, covering everything from cardiovascular health and hormone levels to thyroid function and key nutrients. Glucose is a critical piece of that puzzle, but it’s always analyzed in the context of everything else going on in your body.
This measured approach is designed to answer big-picture questions:
The idea is that by understanding how dozens of these biomarkers interact, you can spot and address the root causes of potential health issues years before they become symptoms. It's a proactive, long-range strategy centered on longevity and preventing disease before it starts.
Function Health is built on the belief that everyone should own their health data and have access to the same advanced diagnostics that were once reserved for elite athletes and executives. The mission is to prevent disease by making comprehensive health insights accessible.
This philosophy aligns with the preventative care models that organizations like the World Health Organization champion, which emphasize early detection and managing risk factors. Function Health gives you the raw data to do exactly that.
In stark contrast, Levels is all about immediate feedback and metabolic optimization. Its focus is narrow but incredibly deep, zeroing in on how your body responds to food, exercise, and stress in real-time, all measured by your glucose levels.
Levels operates on the principle that if you can stabilize your glucose, you can achieve immediate benefits like more consistent energy, a better mood, and sharper focus. Its mission is less about diagnosing diseases down the road and more about optimizing how you feel today through direct, actionable insights.
The platform's core belief is that many people are unaware of how even "healthy" foods can cause significant glucose fluctuations, leading to familiar energy crashes and metabolic strain. By providing real-time data, Levels is designed to make these invisible reactions visible.
This philosophy is all about empowerment through instant cause-and-effect learning.
The core principle behind Levels is that understanding your metabolic response is key to unlocking better health. By providing real-time biofeedback, Levels aims to help you build a personalized diet that works for your unique biology, one meal at a time.
When you step back, the philosophical divide is crystal clear. Function Health provides a comprehensive, annual health audit to inform your long-term strategy. Levels acts as your daily metabolic coach, helping you make better moment-to-moment decisions. Your choice depends on whether you're looking to build a multi-year health road map or win the daily battle for stable energy and metabolic fitness.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Please consult with a qualified healthcare provider before making any changes to your diet, lifestyle, or medical regimen.
When you pit Function Health vs Levels glucose monitoring, the day-to-day experience is where you'll notice the starkest differences. It’s one thing to talk about big-picture health philosophies, but it’s another thing entirely to live with the technology. How you apply the sensor, interact with the app, and make sense of the data is what really defines its value.
While both platforms rely on top-tier CGM hardware—usually a FreeStyle Libre or Dexcom sensor that sits discreetly on the back of your arm—their software and what they do with your data couldn't be more different. The initial setup is similar for both: a quick telehealth consult gets you a prescription, and the instructions for applying the sensor are simple enough.
But once that data starts streaming in, the two services take you down completely different roads.
Levels is all about immediate, actionable feedback. The second you log what you ate, the app crunches the numbers from your glucose response and spits out a score from 1 to 10. This meal-scoring system is the heart of the Levels experience, designed to forge a crystal-clear connection between the food you eat and how your body actually handles it.
This instant feedback loop is incredibly powerful for changing habits on the fly. You might think your morning oatmeal is a healthy choice, only to see it score a 3 after causing a large glucose spike. The next day, you try an omelet, which scores a 9 and keeps your energy stable. That’s a lesson you learn fast.
Here’s a look at how the Levels app visualizes your body’s response to a meal, score and all.

The graph makes it easy to see the glucose spike, how long it lasted, and how quickly you recovered. With this info, you can tweak your next meal—maybe a smaller portion or a different carb source—to aim for a better score.
In short: Levels turns managing your metabolic health into a data-driven game. By scoring every meal, it helps you pinpoint your personal trigger foods and build a diet that works for your biology, not just one that’s "healthy" on paper.
Function Health takes a completely different tack. It doesn't obsess over individual meal scores. Instead, it treats your continuous glucose data as one crucial piece of a much larger health puzzle. The information from your CGM is collected over time and then analyzed right alongside the 100+ biomarkers from your comprehensive blood panels.
The experience is less about quick reactions and more about deep, long-term insights. Function Health connects the dots between your glucose stability and other vital areas of your health. For instance, you’ll see insights like:
This approach gives you a rich, holistic picture. It’s not about what one burrito did to your blood sugar; it's about how your metabolic function is influencing your systemic health over the long haul.
The move from old-school fingerstick tests to continuous monitoring is a massive leap forward for anyone serious about their metabolic health. The hassle of traditional testing, which could mean 6-10 daily finger pricks, made consistent monitoring a real burden and left huge gaps in the data. CGMs, on the other hand, provide a constant stream of information that has been proven to make a real difference.
According to a 2024 study in the Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy, using a CGM was linked to significant improvements in glycemic control for people with type 2 diabetes. If you want to dive into the research, you can explore the study's findings on glycemic outcomes here.
Ultimately, the right choice boils down to what motivates you. If you're driven by immediate results and want clear scores to guide your daily choices, Levels delivers an experience that's hard to beat. But if you're more of a data detective looking to understand the deep connections between your glucose and long-term health, Function Health offers a far more comprehensive and contextualized view.
Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only. It is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before making any lifestyle or medication changes.
Raw CGM data is interesting, but its real power comes from how it's translated into advice you can actually use. This is a key battleground in the Function Health vs Levels glucose monitoring comparison, as each platform takes a wildly different approach to turning your numbers into a health strategy. One offers a strategic, long-term roadmap; the other provides immediate, tactical coaching.
The core difference really comes down to the timescale. Function Health gives you a panoramic view to inform your health decisions for the next year. Levels, on the other hand, offers granular insights to shape your choices for the next meal. Getting this distinction is crucial to picking the right platform for your goals.
Levels is brilliant at delivering immediate, easy-to-digest guidance through its powerful software. The platform's main goal is to help you stabilize your glucose day-to-day by clearly showing you the cause-and-effect between your lifestyle and how your body responds metabolically.
The advice is tactical and built for quick action:
This approach is perfect for anyone trying to optimize their energy and mental clarity right now and really dial in their diet for metabolic fitness.
Function Health, in contrast, places your glucose data into a much larger health story. The insights aren't delivered in real-time. Instead, they’re part of a comprehensive analysis of over 100 biomarkers, all reviewed by a clinician. This elevates your glucose readings from a simple metric to a key piece of your systemic health puzzle.
The guidance here is strategic and zeroed in on long-term disease prevention:
This model is a better fit for people who want to understand and get ahead of long-term health risks, creating a data-driven plan for longevity. The insights from this massive panel are often far more detailed than what you'd get from other at-home tests, a point we dig into in our review of Function Health vs Everlywell's accuracy.
In short: Levels tells you what to do for your next meal based on algorithmic feedback. Function Health's clinician-backed plan tells you what to focus on for the next year to improve your overall health trajectory.
Ultimately, the choice comes down to your primary goal. Are you trying to solve the immediate puzzle of daily energy crashes and dietary confusion? Or are you building a long-term strategy to head off chronic disease? Levels gives you the daily playbook, while Function Health delivers the annual strategic review.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare provider before making significant lifestyle or medication changes.
A health platform's real value often goes beyond its own app. When you’re comparing Function Health vs Levels glucose monitoring, how each service plays with your other tools can be a game-changer. Neither platform is designed to live on an island; they become infinitely more powerful when you plug them into your broader health toolkit.

The data pouring in from your continuous glucose monitor (CGM) is incredibly rich, but it’s only telling one part of the story. The real insights happen when you feed that glucose information into other specialized apps, unlocking a much deeper understanding of your total well-being. This kind of synergy lets you see exactly how your metabolic health is influencing everything from your sleep quality to your cardiovascular performance.
Think of Function Health or Levels as a critical data source—a central hub providing a constant stream of information. The magic happens when you connect that stream to other services that can analyze it through a completely different lens.
For instance, piping your CGM data into a cardiovascular-focused app can reveal some seriously powerful connections. According to the American Heart Association, the link between blood sugar management and heart health is incredibly strong, which makes this specific integration a no-brainer for many people.
If you're focused on heart health, integrating your glucose data isn't just nice to have—it's essential. This is where specialized tracking apps really shine.
By connecting glucose data to an app like HeartFit, you can directly see how a well-managed diet not only improves your metabolic score but also contributes to better long-term cardiovascular outcomes.
For the more tech-savvy user, whether a platform offers an Application Programming Interface (API) is a huge deal. Historically, Levels has been more open with its data, providing an API that lets developers and power users pull their information into custom dashboards or other applications.
This opens up a world of possibilities for a truly personalized setup. Function Health, on the other hand, is more of a closed-loop system, with its focus on clinician-reviewed reports. While this approach ensures a layer of professional oversight on your data, it definitely offers less flexibility for those who want to build their own integrated health dashboards.
When you're comparing Function Health vs. Levels for glucose monitoring, money is a big part of the conversation. The way each company structures its pricing tells you a lot about what they're offering. You have to decide if you're budgeting for a massive, once-a-year health deep-dive or a specialized software subscription that gives you real-time feedback on your metabolism.
Function Health goes for an all-in-one membership model. You pay a single annual fee, and that covers everything: comprehensive lab tests for over 100 biomarkers, the required review by a clinician, and your personalized action plan. It bundles the blood draws, the lab work, and the expert analysis into one predictable cost. Think of it as a long-term investment in preventative health.
Levels, on the other hand, splits up its software and hardware costs. You pay them an annual membership fee just to access their slick software, which is designed to analyze and score your glucose data. But on top of that, you're on the hook for buying the continuous glucose monitor (CGM) sensors yourself. That becomes a recurring monthly expense for as long as you want to keep tracking.
This is a critical difference. Function Health's cost is front-loaded and covers a huge range of tests. With Levels, the software fee is lower to start, but the ongoing sensor costs create a pay-as-you-go situation for the actual monitoring hardware. If you want to see how Function Health's all-inclusive price stacks up against other biomarker services, check out our Function Health vs InsideTracker pricing guide.
Here’s a side-by-side look at what you’re paying for:
The real power of CGM technology is how it keeps you engaged with your health day in and day out. Old-school fingerstick testing has an adherence rate of around 50% simply because it's a pain to do. In contrast, CGMs just work, sending data every few minutes with almost no effort on your part, which makes consistent tracking much easier. You can discover more insights about CGM adherence and its clinical impact.
In short: The core financial question is this: Are you paying for a comprehensive diagnostic dataset (Function Health) or a sophisticated software layer that interprets a specific data stream (Levels)? Your answer depends entirely on your health objectives.
Ultimately, picking the right service means looking past the sticker price to what you truly need. Are you after a deep, wide-ranging health analysis once a year? Or do you want the immediate, daily feedback loop that a dedicated glucose monitoring app provides? Each model offers a distinct path toward health optimization, built for different goals and budgets.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with your healthcare provider before making any financial decisions related to your health or adopting new health technologies.
When you're digging into advanced health tracking, a lot of questions come up. Let's clear up some of the most common ones about Function Health and Levels so you can feel confident about your next step.
Yes, you do. In the United States, a continuous glucose monitor (CGM) is a medical device, which requires a prescription. The good news is that both Function Health and Levels have this process dialed in for their members. They handle setting up a telehealth consult with a doctor who can review your situation and write the prescription, making sure everything is handled safely and legally.
This really boils down to what an athlete is trying to accomplish.
If your goal is immediate performance tuning, Levels is hard to beat. It gives you that real-time feedback on how your pre- and post-workout meals are affecting your energy and recovery. It’s perfect for dialing in nutrition during a competitive season.
On the other hand, if you're focused on foundational health and longevity, Function Health is the clear winner. It looks at the bigger picture—hormones, inflammation, organ function—all of which are the bedrock of long-term athletic performance. Think of it as the tool for your annual health deep-dive to guide an off-season strategy.
While both platforms use CGM technology, they're built for health optimization in people without a diabetes diagnosis. If you've been diagnosed with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, your care needs to be managed directly by your medical team. According to the CDC, your endocrinologist or primary care physician should be the one prescribing and overseeing your CGM use as part of a complete treatment plan. These platforms are not intended as a replacement for that critical medical care.
Function Health was designed from the ground up for this very purpose. By analyzing over 100 biomarkers across your cardiovascular, metabolic, hormonal, and organ systems, it gives you a comprehensive baseline to track your health over years.
Levels is a fantastic tool for understanding your immediate metabolic reactions to food and exercise, which is definitely a key piece of the long-term health puzzle. But it does not offer the same broad, diagnostic scope you get from a full biomarker panel.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare provider before starting any new health program or using a medical device.
Ready to turn your health data into sustainable habits? HeartFit is an AI-powered app that transforms your action plan into a fun, gamified system of daily tasks. It integrates seamlessly with your health data to provide real-time feedback and keep you motivated on your journey to better heart health.
Start your free trial at https://www.heartfit.ai.