Explore our in-depth Function Health vs Mito Health review. We compare biomarker testing, user experience, and pricing to help you choose the best service.

When you stack up Function Health against Mito Health, the core difference comes down to their primary mission. Function Health is all about giving you a comprehensive health baseline by running a massive panel of over 100 biomarkers. Think of it as a thorough, holistic snapshot of your wellness right now.
In contrast, Mito Health zeroes in on longevity and peak performance, targeting very specific markers known to influence your long-term healthspan. So, the right choice really hinges on a simple question: are you looking for a broad analysis of your current state, or a targeted plan to optimize your future?
This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Please consult a healthcare provider before making any lifestyle or medication changes.
The landscape of personal health is shifting away from reacting to sickness and moving toward proactive prevention. Function Health and Mito Health are two of the key players driving this change, both offering deep insights into your body's inner workings with advanced biomarker testing. The first step in picking one is getting a feel for their fundamental philosophies to see which one aligns with your own health journey.
This screenshot from Function Health's site really captures their core promise: getting a complete picture from a huge range of blood tests.

The focus on "100+ lab tests" and a personalized "Action Plan" makes it clear they're committed to giving users a broad, educational look at where their health stands today.
Function Health is built for anyone who wants a detailed, 360-degree view of their health as it is right now. It’s perfect if you want to establish a solid baseline, check for potential risks across different systems (like your heart and metabolism), and walk away with a wide-ranging action plan.
Mito Health, on the other hand, speaks to a more niche audience: people laser-focused on the science of longevity and maximizing their healthspan. Their testing is more specialized, homing in on markers tied directly to aging and performance. This makes it a natural fit for biohackers or health-savvy individuals looking to fine-tune an already solid routine.
If you're curious about turning test results into lasting habits, you might find some good tips over on our HeartFit blog.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Always consult with a qualified healthcare provider before making any changes to your diet, exercise routine, or health plan.
This proactive approach is becoming more critical. The concept of 'functional health'—which is all about holistic wellbeing, not just the absence of disease—is crucial as populations age. You can see this clearly when you look at neurodegenerative conditions. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias affect about 55 million people worldwide, a number projected to rise significantly. The condition is closely linked to mitochondrial dysfunction, highlighting the direct line between our cellular energy (mitochondrial health) and our overall quality of life (functional health). A detailed 2023 neuroscience study published in Frontiers in Neuroscience dives deep into this connection.
To make the main differences crystal clear, here’s a quick side-by-side comparison.
This table breaks down the essential distinctions between what each platform offers and who it's best for.
FeatureFunction HealthMito HealthPrimary FocusComprehensive wellness and establishing a health baseline.Longevity, healthspan optimization, and peak performance.Testing ScopeVery broad, covering 100+ biomarkers across all major systems.Targeted, focusing on specialized markers for longevity and aging.Ideal UserAnyone seeking a detailed overview of their current health status.Biohackers and individuals focused on long-term health optimization.
Ultimately, this high-level view should help you see which service aligns better with your immediate goals—getting a complete check-up or fine-tuning for the long haul.
When you get down to it, the real difference between these services is in the bloodwork itself. The specific biomarkers each company chooses to test reveals everything about their core philosophy on health. It's not just a numbers game—it’s about the why behind the tests.
Both Function Health and Mito Health offer panels with over 100 biomarkers. At first glance, they seem similar. But dig a little deeper, and you’ll see two distinct approaches. Function Health casts a wide net to give you a comprehensive snapshot of your current health. Mito Health, on the other hand, takes a more targeted approach, zeroing in on markers specifically tied to longevity and peak performance.
Function Health's panel feels like getting the most extensive annual physical imaginable. It’s designed to give you a holistic overview, catching subtle imbalances across all your body’s systems before they turn into bigger issues.
They cover the essentials, but in great detail:
The goal here is breadth. Function Health wants to connect the dots between different systems—like how a sluggish thyroid might be driving up your cholesterol. This makes their panel a fantastic starting point if you're looking for a thorough, all-around health audit.
Mito Health goes in a different direction. Their panel is laser-focused on biomarkers directly linked to healthspan and the biology of aging. While they cover many of the same foundational markers as Function Health, they really stand out by including more specialized, forward-looking tests.
This screenshot from their site says it all—the focus is on a "comprehensive" screening that leads to a "1:1 consultation" to build a personalized longevity plan.

This isn’t just about data; it's about turning that data into an actionable strategy.
Some of Mito Health’s standout markers include:
Mito's approach is all about optimization. It's less of a general check-up and more of a strategic deep-dive aimed at fine-tuning your biology for a longer, healthier life.
In short: The crucial difference is intent. Function Health asks, "How is your body functioning right now?" while Mito Health asks, "What can we optimize to improve your healthspan for the future?"
To make the differences crystal clear, let's break down their testing and reporting methodologies side-by-side. This table highlights the core distinctions in what they offer.
Comparison CriteriaFunction HealthMito HealthTesting PhilosophyComprehensive Baseline: Aims for a 360-degree view of your current health across all major systems.Longevity Optimization: Focuses on markers directly tied to aging, healthspan, and peak performance.Key DifferentiatorsBreadth of Panel: Tests over 100 markers to give a wide-angle snapshot of your overall wellness.Depth of Panel: Includes specialized markers like ApoB and Lp(a) for proactive, forward-looking risk assessment.Cardiovascular PanelStandard lipids (Total Cholesterol, LDL, HDL, Triglycerides) plus inflammation markers (hs-CRP).Advanced lipids (ApoB, Lp(a)) on top of standard markers for a more precise cardiovascular risk profile.Reporting FocusEducational Insights: Reports are designed to help you understand what each biomarker means and its role in your health.Actionable Longevity Plan: Results are immediately translated into a personalized plan focused on long-term health improvements.
No matter which service you pick, the real work begins after you get your results. Turning that data into daily habits is key. For ongoing, habit-focused support, especially for heart health, you might want to explore the features of the HeartFit app, which can help translate your big-picture plan into a sustainable lifestyle.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition.
Getting your blood drawn is the easy part. The real test of any health service is what happens after the lab sends your results back. How that raw data is presented, interpreted, and turned into something you can actually use is what separates a good service from a truly great one. This is where Function Health and Mito Health show their completely different philosophies.
Both platforms want to translate your complex biomarker data into useful insights. But their approaches to visualization, personalization, and clinician feedback are miles apart, and that difference directly impacts how empowered you feel to take charge of your health.
Function Health’s dashboard is built for clarity and learning. Once your results are in, you’re greeted with a clean, well-organized interface that sorts your 100+ biomarkers into intuitive buckets like "Heart Health," "Metabolism," and "Hormones."
For each biomarker, you see your specific value plotted against an optimal range. It’s an instant visual check that helps you spot which areas need your attention. One of the dashboard's biggest strengths is the detailed "Why it matters" section for every single marker, which explains its role in your body and what it means if you're out of range.
Key Insight: Function Health is all about education. Their dashboard is basically a comprehensive learning tool, empowering you by explaining the what and the why behind every number. It's perfect for anyone wanting to establish a health baseline and really understand their body.
The platform also generates an "Action Plan" with suggestions for foods and supplements based on your results. While it's personalized to a degree, think of it more as a general guide. The real custom-tailoring comes from the detailed clinician notes, which tie all your results together into a cohesive story about your health and point out connections between different biomarkers.
Mito Health goes for a much more hands-on, consultative approach. They also have a digital dashboard, but the core of their experience is a personalized health report paired with a one-on-one consultation with a licensed clinician.
Their reports aren't just a data dump; they're designed as a strategic blueprint for longevity. Instead of just showing you the numbers, Mito translates them directly into a longevity-focused action plan. The emphasis is less on the raw data and more on the targeted, expert-driven recommendations that come from it.
The mandatory clinician consultation is the real game-changer here. This is where a healthcare professional sits down with you (virtually), walks through your results, answers your questions, and helps you set concrete, achievable goals. That human touch ensures you not only understand your report but walk away with a clear, professionally guided path forward.
No matter which service you lean towards, the end goal is always the same: turning these insights into daily habits. This is where dedicated habit-tracking apps can be incredibly helpful.
Take this screenshot from HeartFit.ai, for example. It shows how a specialized app can distill complex health data into simple, manageable daily tasks.

The app’s interface is all about tracking specific, personalized actions like "Eat 2 servings of fatty fish" or "Take Omega-3." It perfectly bridges the gap between your comprehensive health report and actually doing the work day-to-day.
Here’s how the two platforms stack up when it comes to user experience and turning data into action:
FeatureFunction Health DashboardMito Health Report & ConsultationPrimary GoalTo educate and provide a comprehensive health overview.To create a personalized, actionable longevity plan with expert guidance.Data PresentationClean, visual layout organized by health category with trend tracking.Integrated into a narrative report focused on actionable next steps.PersonalizationPersonalized clinician notes and a general, algorithm-driven action plan.Deeply personalized through a mandatory 1:1 clinician consultation.Best ForPeople who want to dig into their own data and track trends independently.People who prefer a guided experience and a professionally crafted health strategy.
Bottom line: Function Health gives you an excellent platform for self-guided discovery and education. Mito Health, on the other hand, delivers a more structured, high-touch experience designed to build a precise, expert-led plan for longevity.
When you’re looking at any health service, the price is always a big piece of the puzzle, but it’s rarely the whole story. To really compare Function Health and Mito Health, you have to look past the initial cost and figure out what you’re actually getting for your money over the long haul. The right choice really hinges on what you want to do with the data you get back.
Function Health keeps things simple with a straightforward annual membership. You pay $499 per year, and that gets you into their platform, gives you access to clinician notes, and delivers a personalized action plan. This fee covers two big blood tests each year, but keep in mind you’ll have to pay for the lab draws separately, which can add to the total cost. It's a predictable, recurring cost designed for people who want to consistently track their health year after year.
Mito Health takes a different route with a more flexible, pay-as-you-go model. Their flagship biomarker panel is a one-time fee of $399. That price is all-inclusive—it covers the lab draw, a super detailed health report, and, most importantly, a one-on-one consultation with a licensed clinician to walk you through it all. This setup is perfect if you’re looking for a serious deep-dive without being locked into a subscription.
They also let you add on specialized tests, like a full-body MRI or food allergy panels, so you can build a testing package that’s specific to your needs. If you have particular health questions you want answers to, this can be a much more targeted and cost-effective way to go.
The Bottom Line: Function Health's annual fee is built for consistent, biannual testing—great for tracking trends. Mito Health's one-time price delivers a high-impact, expert-guided analysis that’s a strategic investment for targeted longevity planning.
The value you get from each service is baked right into its core philosophy. With Function Health, your money buys a powerful educational platform for self-directed health exploration. The real win is in watching your health data over time, spotting trends, and getting a big-picture view of your own biology.
Mito Health, on the other hand, is all about expert guidance. That mandatory clinician consultation is a massive value-add. They take all that complex data and help you translate it into a professional, actionable strategy. This is especially critical when you're digging into something as nuanced as cellular health. According to data from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), mitochondrial diseases are estimated to affect roughly 1 in 5,000 people globally. This just underscores how vital expert interpretation is when you're dealing with such intricate biological systems. You can get a better sense of the diagnostic challenges from this detailed overview on MedlinePlus.
Here’s a quick way to think about it, matching your budget to your goals:
Choosing between Function Health and Mito Health really comes down to what you’re trying to accomplish right now. Are you looking to get a comprehensive, foundational map of your current health? Or are you laser-focused on fine-tuning your biology for long-term performance and longevity?
Figuring that out is the first and most important step.
This simple decision tree helps visualize which path makes the most sense for your primary goal.

As you can see, the core idea is pretty clear. Think of Function Health as your tool for ongoing monitoring and Mito Health as a strategic, deep-dive investment in your future self.
Function Health is the perfect starting point for anyone who wants a thorough, wide-angle snapshot of their health as it stands today. It truly excels at establishing a robust baseline that touches on all major physiological systems.
Function Health is likely your best bet if you see yourself in these descriptions:
In short: Function Health gives you a massive amount of data to build a complete health picture. This makes it an outstanding tool for foundational wellness and self-guided learning.
Mito Health is designed for a more specific crowd—people who are already dialed in on their health and are now looking to optimize for the long haul. Its panel is strategically built to deliver insights into the core mechanisms of aging and peak performance.
Mito Health is probably the right move if this sounds more like you:
The difference here is crucial. Functional health is about keeping your body running well day-to-day. Mitochondrial health, on the other hand, is about the very energy production that makes any function possible. A severe mitochondrial disease like Leigh syndrome, which affects roughly 1 in 40,000 newborns according to the NIH, tragically illustrates this. The disease causes a rapid decline in function, driving home just how fundamental cellular energy is to our overall wellness. You can learn more about the profound impact of mitochondrial disorders from respected institutions like the Mayo Clinic.
No matter which service you end up choosing, remember that the test results are just the starting line. The real work—and the real results—come from translating those insights into consistent, daily actions. This is where a dedicated habit-tracking app becomes an essential part of your health toolkit.
Here are the top apps for turning your health report into reality:
By pairing a comprehensive testing service with an action-oriented app like HeartFit, you create a powerful closed-loop system. You’re turning high-level data into the sustainable habits that actually drive lasting health improvements.
After putting Function Health and Mito Health head-to-head, the answer isn’t about which one is flat-out “better.” It really comes down to which one is the right tool for your specific job. Both services are powerful, but they’re built for different people with different goals.
Your choice should hinge on where you are in your health journey, what you’re looking to spend, and how you want to interact with the data you get back.
Think of Function Health as your comprehensive starting point. It’s perfect if you're just kicking off a proactive approach to your health or want a wide-angle view of your body's current state. With its 100+ biomarker panel, you get a solid, educational baseline to track broad changes over time.
Mito Health, on the other hand, is for the person who’s already in the game and looking to level up—specifically for longevity. Its focused panel, which includes key markers like ApoB, and the required clinician consult make it a strategic play for anyone serious about optimizing their healthspan with expert guidance.
To cut through the noise, ask yourself these three questions:
The Bottom Line: Function Health gives you an accessible, wide-angle lens on your wellness, putting broad knowledge in your hands. Mito Health offers a specialized, deep-focus lens on longevity, arming you with a precise, expert-driven strategy.
Ultimately, whether you go with Function or Mito, the goal is the same: to turn these insights into real, sustainable lifestyle changes. The data is just the starting line; the real value comes from how you use it. As the National Institutes of Health (NIH) points out, making informed decisions based on credible health information is the cornerstone of proactive wellness.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of your physician or another qualified health provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition or before making any lifestyle changes.
Jumping into the world of biomarker testing is exciting, but it's natural to have a few questions. Here are some of the most common things people ask about services like Function Health and Mito Health and where they fit into your overall health plan.
No, you do not need a referral from your doctor to get started with either Function Health or Mito Health. Both companies offer direct-to-consumer testing, meaning you can sign up, order your tests, and get your results all on your own.
That said, it’s always a smart move to share your results with your trusted healthcare provider. The American Heart Association also emphasizes this—keeping your doctor in the loop is key to making sound health decisions. These tests provide valuable data, but they're meant to add to, not replace, professional medical advice.
How often you test really comes down to your personal health goals and what you're trying to track.
For more general info on this topic, we've put together a guide covering frequently asked questions about personal health data.
This one’s a hard no. While these biomarker panels are incredibly detailed, they are absolutely not a substitute for your annual physical exam. Nothing replaces a hands-on examination, a deep dive into your personal and family medical history, and a real conversation with your doctor about symptoms that a blood test just can't see.
Think of services like Function Health and Mito Health as powerful supplements to your traditional healthcare. They provide a deeper, data-driven look into your internal health that can enrich the conversation you have with your doctor.
When comparing a function health vs mito health review, it’s obvious both platforms are designed to arm you with more information about your own body. The goal is to use that information to have smarter, more productive conversations with your doctor, leading to a truly collaborative approach to your long-term wellness.
Ready to turn your health insights into daily habits? Heart Fit helps you build a sustainable routine based on your unique health data, making it easier than ever to stick to your action plan. Start your free trial and take control of your heart health journey today at https://www.heartfit.ai.